Mold / Fungus

Morgellons Disease, The Mold and Fungus Connection

There is a stealth virus among us, and we believe that Morgellons is a genetic hybrid of a couple different phenomenon.

Eukaryitic organisms (Eukaryotes) include the Kingdom fungi.

We also believe that Mycoplasma is Archaea and not necessarily bacterial. The line between bacteria and Archaea has gotten better defined over the last few years. It has been determined that Archaea are not bacteria. What is also odd is that the Archaea seem to more closely resemble Eukaryote evolution than it resembles Prokaryote evolution.  Archaea have no cell nucleus. We believe that the delivery system for time detonated degenerative pandemics are delivered via mycoplasma comprised of microbes within the Archaea domain . . . which makes them sort of “Not-Bacteria” but resembling bacteria in many ways. It is damn close to being a mini-mold. Mycoplasma can penetrate the cell wall lipid and keep the cell alive allowing the transfer of genetic material that has been engineered to cause any disease. This occurs during the budding cyle of the Archaea organisms.

The Universal Tree of Life and Microbial Diversity

The Shrub of Life (seen above) which includes lateral gene transfer

Can we construct a tree illustrating the relatedness of the three domains, with one common ancestor for all life? Woese and his colleagues have argued — based on phylogenetic methodology and data from several genes — that there is a common ancestor. Starting in the 1970s Carl Woese proposed that variation in the sequences of DNA encoding ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in different organisms would provide valuable information regarding evolutionary relatedness. rRNA is an integral part of ribosomal structure, so it is found in all organisms.

The genomes of several members of the Archaea have been entirely sequenced and have been compared with the genomes of other organisms. Such studies confirm that Archaea constitute a separate group: These organisms contain hundreds of genes with no counterparts in Bacteria or Eukarya. Unexpectedly, ribosomal proteins from Archaea were found to be more similar to those of Eukarya than to Bacterial ribosomal proteins. They further argue that Archaea and Eukarya are more closely related to each other, and that Bacteria diverged from the common ancestor first. See the Evolution and Phylogenetics.

Other biologists have countered that the true universal tree of life may be more complicated than the picture that Woese and his colleagues presented. The complication is lateral gene transfer, where individuals exchange genes between one another.

Although not generally exhibited in Eukarya, mechanisms for lateral gene transfer (also known as horizontal gene transfer) are well known in Bacteria. Genes are exchanged between bacterial species by the action of viruses and by conjugation (cell-to-cell contact in which DNA copied from a plasmid or chromosome is transferred to a recipient cell). Under special conditions, some bacteria are known to take up “naked” DNA from the environment.

Lateral gene transfer, if restricted to very similar organisms, would not pose a problem for constructing a universal tree of life. However, there is evidence that genes have been exchanged between very distant organisms. Eukarya acquired mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA from Bacteria. Nuclear genes in eukaryotes seem to be derived from Bacteria as well, not just from Archaea. Genes are also shared between Archaea and Bacteria.

Twenty-four percent of the genome of the bacterium Thermotoga maritima contains archaen DNA. Similarly, the archaean Archaeoglobus fulgidus has numerous bacterial genes. Some scientists believe that a more diverse community of primitive cells gave rise to the three domains and that the notion of a single universal ancestor might be replaced. W. Ford Doolittle (Dalhousie University) has suggested that lateral gene transfer among early organisms has generated a “tree of life,” which more closely resembles a shrub with untreelike links (shared genes) connecting the branches. (quoted source learner.org)

 

PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) is a technique for studying organisms that cannot be grown in a laboratory. An excellent document to review on the subject is here:

 Morgellons and the Shrub of Life PDF Document

PCR is an advanced method of not only exploring new life and DNA sequences, but also inventing new forms of life out of pre-existing sequences. It leaves much open to the imagination. Things can get pretty sci-fi from there.

The level of advancement the military industrial establishment has made in this area probably far exceeds the knowledge provided to the general public. For example, heat shock treatment makes protein metabolism and can crate stronger thermoprotective proteins. Some (not all) Archaea tend to do this on their own- that is they create high concentrations of thermoprotective proteins (heat shock proteins).

Mycoplasma is also widely known to be a potential delivery system for “stealth” bio-warfare viruses.

Lateral gene swapping combined with the formation of new and mutating biofilms are literally creating new forms of life. What makes matters even more interesting is that science keeps changing its mind about what some of these old forms of life actually are.

For example, Mycoplasma is considered to be bacteria by the layman, and is known to cause walking pneumonia, a typical pneumonia. But during my research, what I find interesting is that few worthwhile online sources have made the connection between mycoplasma and the Archaea domain.

Part of the problem is that Archaea have been reclassified over the last few years. In the past they were viewed as an unusual group of bacteria and named archaebacteria but since the Archaea have an independent evolutionary history and show many differences in their biochemistry from other forms of life, they are now classified as a separate domain in the three-domain system.

Furthermore, Mycoplasma still falls under the Kingdom bacteria.

Mycoplasma is a genus of bacteria which lack a cell wall. Without a cell wall, they are unaffected by many common antibiotics such as penicillin or other beta-lactam antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis.

I will go one step further and suggest the idea that the various designer Vifungeria Stealth Virus’ that have been let loose on the world actually are Archaea family Mycoplasma, and therefore no longer fall under the Kingdom Bacteria, but are of the Domain Archaea.

The Archaea domain is not fully understood.

They have been around for a long time. They can live in extremely harsh environments and can generate their own heat-shock survival metabolisms.

I am not a microbiologist, but there is some confusing doublespeak coming out of the microbiology community on this matter.

Could this have something to do with the fact that it is practically illegal to test for Mycoplasma infections during blood tests in the United States? If there is such a shroud of secrecy around this topic of research, what hope is there of properly classifying these little microbes?

If Archaea Mycoplasma are indeed the mechanism behind the gene therapy used to create stealth virus delivery systems, then the reason for the secrecy should be obvious.

- Sungazer

The Following VIDEO covers bio-warfare mycoplasma gene transfer, as defined in the recovered gvt. documents outlining the creation of HIV.
Is this related to Morgellons Disease? Follow your research, and research well, remember the answers are already in front of us.